The event horizon is actually always perfectly spherical and so the radius of the event horizon is actually a perfect description of its geometry. The reason the surface of the region of no return is called the event horizon is that events that happen on the outside of it may have an effect on other events that happen farther away but events that happen inside of the event horizon cannot affect anything outside of it. This is because information can only travel at the speed of light and so information can't get transmitted from inside to outside a black hole.

The event horizon of course has no physical substance and is not the surface of a black hole in the sense that a star has a surface. In fact we do not know if there is a material surface of a black hole or not. It is generally considered that because the gravitational acceleration inside the event horizon exceeds the speed of light no other force could be sufficient to overcome it and therefore all matter inside a black hole must collapse to a single point. This point is known as the singularity. However it is possible that because of quantum effects or effects due to string theory there may be a point beyond which it is not possible to compress matter in which case there would be a tiny nugget of unimaginably dense material at the core of each black hole. As a point of reference it is interesting to note that the density of a neutron star is somewhere in the neighborhood of 10

^{17}Kg/m

^{3}and the primary agent against further collapse of neutron stars is in fact the pauli exclusion principle. So quantum effects are already needed to keep neutron stars from collapsing to a singularity.

The model of a black hole that I have been describing up to this point is what is called the non-rotating or Schwarzschild black hole. It is a solution to Einstein's equations for the case where there is no rotation and no charge. both rotating and charged black holes are fascinating critters but for the moment I am just going to keep on ignoring them maybe I will include a post about them later.

You may have heard the phrase that "black holes have no hair" this simply means that black holes have only three independent properties, mass, angular momentum, and charge. They have no hair in the sense that unlike any other macroscopic object they are totally indistinguishable but for those three properties. Since we are looking at non-rotating and non-charged black holes the only item of interest is the radius of the event horizon and its relation to mass. Interestingly enough the radius that classical mechanics suggests for such an object turns out to be the correct radius. This radius of the black hole for the non-rotating case is called the Schwarzschild radius.

If you compress a mass down to close to its Schwarzschild radius it will collapse into a singularity under its own gravity. The equation for the Schwarzschild radius is R = 2GM/c

^{2}, where G is the gravitational constant and c is of course the speed of light. Now for the grand finale of the post we apply this equation to find the approximate Schwarzschild radius for Jupiter as being 2*6*10

^{-11}*10

^{27}/(9*10

^{18}). Which is about 1.3 meters. Now compressing the entirety of jupiter's mass into a volume of only 1.3 meters may seem just a tad on the side of implausible and I would tend to agree. However keep in mind that this is the radius that one would need to put matter in in order to make it collapse under its own gravitational field alone. At any rate though we have our first rough calculations of what it would take to make jupiter a black hole.

## 2 comments:

OK, stupid question time. You said in your first post that we could conduct experiments with this newly created black hole, yet if nothing can escape it, including light at this event horizon, then how can we get back data from inside this radius? Would it just get sucked in so to speak?

We don't need to conduct experiments inside of that radius. We don't want to do stuff inside the event horizon. I will make a more in depth post of this later but basically what I am talking about when I say we could use it as a particle accelerator is we put smaller particle accelerators in orbit around the black hole and create some high energy particles which we shoot into orbit around the black hole. The higher the energy the particle accelerator is the closer orbit we can make the particles take up. Then we fire another stream of particles in such a way that they will collide with the first close to the black hole. Now the particles as they fall towards the black hole when they get very near the event horizon their energies will be much much greater than we shot them off with having picked up energy from the gravity well. Just so long as we set up the trajectories cleverly we can ensure really fantastically high energy impacts. Now any light that is transmitted normal to the event horizon outside of the event horizon will escape the black hole. and depending on how far out we make the experiment a good proportion of the light generated by the experiment will get transmitted back out. additionally we could send little cheap detectors towards the black hole to detect particles created in the collision directly and then the detectors would send a light signal directly back to us before getting sucked in. There are other ways to gather information from these experiments too since the energies we will be dealing with will be so tremendous particles that are created in these collisions will be traveling a very high percentage of the speed of light themselves and will most likely have no trouble escaping the gravity well of the black hole and we can detect them with orbiting detectors as they fly off into space.

Post a Comment